After the COVID-19 pandemic stopped many asylum procedures around Europe, new technologies are now reviving these types of systems. By lie detection tools tested at the boundary to a system for verifying documents and transcribes selection interviews, a wide range of solutions is being used by asylum applications. This article explores how these solutions have reshaped the ways asylum procedures are conducted. That reveals just how asylum seekers happen to be transformed into pressured hindered techno-users: They are asked to adhere to a series of techno-bureaucratic steps and keep up with unforeseen tiny changes in criteria and deadlines. This kind of obstructs the capacity to run these systems and to follow their legal right for proper protection.
It also shows how these kinds of technologies happen to be embedded in refugee governance: They facilitate the 'circuits of financial-humanitarianism' that function through a whirlwind of spread technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers' socio-legal precarity by hindering these people from interacting with the stations of safeguard. It www.ascella-llc.com/generated-post-2/ further argues that studies of securitization and victimization should be put together with an insight in the disciplinary mechanisms of those technologies, in which migrants are turned into data-generating subjects whom are self-disciplined by their reliance on technology.
Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal expertise, the article states that these technology have an inherent obstructiveness. There is a double effect: while they assist to expedite the asylum method, they also generate it difficult meant for refugees to navigate these types of systems. They can be positioned in a 'knowledge deficit' that makes these people vulnerable to illegitimate decisions created by non-governmental actors, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their circumstances. Moreover, they pose fresh risks of’machine mistakes' which may result in inaccurate or discriminatory outcomes.